lkapildev
11-19 04:40 PM
You work for Govt on H1b. Payment would not be an issue. The only issue could be experince certificate. They might ask you to provide experience certificates.
NSC is really crazy about RFE. They complan about resource and they have time to issue RFE. 99% RFE's are cleared on first response.
NSC is really crazy about RFE. They complan about resource and they have time to issue RFE. 99% RFE's are cleared on first response.
wallpaper disney coloring pages - free
herns
03-20 04:12 PM
Im EB3. so should I say my PD is the filing date?
copsmart
01-08 08:43 AM
http://in.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idINBOM40463220090108
Really a tough time for Satyam employees.
Really a tough time for Satyam employees.
2011 printable coloring pages
skdskd
08-26 12:02 PM
Friends I think a great injustice is being done to NSC filers , their applications are taking months for ead and ap, while TSC filers are getting ead adn AP as soon as they get receipt, do you think this will improve for NSC in future, at this time looks like august NSC filers will haveto wait till the end of the year for EAD,ap, which is sad.
"My small cut on finger is more painful then somebody's fractured leg"
"My small cut on finger is more painful then somebody's fractured leg"
more...
soma
02-11 01:12 PM
I think the new name check change, will help the system work FIFO.
This is what the system is intended to do.
Also, as time goes by, this will make the PD more transparent, so instead of having dreams and making wild guesses, there can be somewhat logical guessing.
I know it is not possible as it is USCIS and anything can be true.
But i am really happy for people with older PD's who have been struck with FBI Name checks.
Please help IV with the letter campaign and also lets get together and try to make the system more transparent and open.
GO IV GO. TOGTHER WE CAN.
But even with primitive PD's if visa nos are not available, things will still be the same. What say abt 6 yr old pd's in EB2...namecheck removal doesn't help!!!
This is what the system is intended to do.
Also, as time goes by, this will make the PD more transparent, so instead of having dreams and making wild guesses, there can be somewhat logical guessing.
I know it is not possible as it is USCIS and anything can be true.
But i am really happy for people with older PD's who have been struck with FBI Name checks.
Please help IV with the letter campaign and also lets get together and try to make the system more transparent and open.
GO IV GO. TOGTHER WE CAN.
But even with primitive PD's if visa nos are not available, things will still be the same. What say abt 6 yr old pd's in EB2...namecheck removal doesn't help!!!
eager_immi
01-25 12:00 PM
Any volunteer for this project. please send me a private message.
Thanks
Thanks
more...
agc2005
12-13 10:17 AM
See this
Ineligible countries
Those born in any territory that has sent more than 50,000 immigrants to the US in the previous five years are not eligible to receive a diversity visa. For the DV natives of the following nations were ineligible: Brazil, Canada, China (mainland-born), Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, India, Jamaica, Mexico, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Korea, United Kingdom (except Northern Ireland) and its dependent territories, and Vietnam [1]. The entry period for DV-2009 was October 3, 2007 through December 2, 2007.
The ineligible countries may change from year to year, and are determined by counting those countries which sent 50,000 "immigrants" in the five years including that covered by the last published immigration statistics.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversity_Immigrant_Visa
It is a Scam..
Ineligible countries
Those born in any territory that has sent more than 50,000 immigrants to the US in the previous five years are not eligible to receive a diversity visa. For the DV natives of the following nations were ineligible: Brazil, Canada, China (mainland-born), Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, India, Jamaica, Mexico, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Korea, United Kingdom (except Northern Ireland) and its dependent territories, and Vietnam [1]. The entry period for DV-2009 was October 3, 2007 through December 2, 2007.
The ineligible countries may change from year to year, and are determined by counting those countries which sent 50,000 "immigrants" in the five years including that covered by the last published immigration statistics.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversity_Immigrant_Visa
It is a Scam..
2010 Free Disney Colouring Pages
kaisersose
07-19 04:00 PM
Do they have a signature authorization from you? If not , they can not send a G-28 that is not signed by YOU !
On the first page of 485, my employer put his address.
So I am guessing the 485 receipt will go to him even without any G-28.
EAD and AP will directly come to you anyway.
On the first page of 485, my employer put his address.
So I am guessing the 485 receipt will go to him even without any G-28.
EAD and AP will directly come to you anyway.
more...
chantu
10-18 08:42 PM
This is what I am saying about western funded Media.
Dark Diwali: 6 firemen choke to death in Thane - India - The Times of India (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Dark-Diwali-6-firemen-choke-to-death-in-Thane/articleshow/5137464.cms)
"Dark Diwali"...what is the need to mention that.
I do not want to comment on the validity of your question. However I as well as many of this forum members feel that this question is not for this forum. This forum should strictly used for Immigration to USA related issues and discussions.
I hope you will agree that I in "IV" stands for Immigration and not any special country's name.
Dark Diwali: 6 firemen choke to death in Thane - India - The Times of India (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Dark-Diwali-6-firemen-choke-to-death-in-Thane/articleshow/5137464.cms)
"Dark Diwali"...what is the need to mention that.
I do not want to comment on the validity of your question. However I as well as many of this forum members feel that this question is not for this forum. This forum should strictly used for Immigration to USA related issues and discussions.
I hope you will agree that I in "IV" stands for Immigration and not any special country's name.
hair SPRING COLOURING BOOK PAGES
Pravan
10-02 12:59 PM
Always, Always, Always maintain liquidity!! The benefit of having the money with you far offsets any benefits of saving anything on mortgage interest rate payments. CASH is unboubtedly indeed the KING !!
more...
apahilaj
05-12 05:05 PM
This is the address I got when I submitted my application online.
U.S. Mail:
USCIS Texas Service Center
Attn: E-Filed I-765
P.O. Box 852401
Mesquite, TX 75185-2401
Thanks. I did not e-file my application. I had sent my package to the same address as yours (except for the Attn E-file line) via USPS.
Should I call USCIS to clarify things up or will they forward it to the Vermont center if it really needed to be mailed to vermont?
U.S. Mail:
USCIS Texas Service Center
Attn: E-Filed I-765
P.O. Box 852401
Mesquite, TX 75185-2401
Thanks. I did not e-file my application. I had sent my package to the same address as yours (except for the Attn E-file line) via USPS.
Should I call USCIS to clarify things up or will they forward it to the Vermont center if it really needed to be mailed to vermont?
hot disney#39;s tangled coloring
jnraajan
01-28 12:55 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^
more...
house Free TinkerBell Color Pages
tnite
09-19 03:32 PM
His name is Yann ,I hosted him .
myself , chandu , siddhi, poonam and tikka had lunch with him at the Union Station and he did tell us his experiences .
Ppl on their own have to realize the importance of a movement like this .No amount of convincing by friends/relatives would make any difference.
Hats off to ppl like Yann , Swede who really understood what this rally was all about...
myself , chandu , siddhi, poonam and tikka had lunch with him at the Union Station and he did tell us his experiences .
Ppl on their own have to realize the importance of a movement like this .No amount of convincing by friends/relatives would make any difference.
Hats off to ppl like Yann , Swede who really understood what this rally was all about...
tattoo the dora the explorer coloring
IndianIII
03-20 12:06 AM
I would like the STEM related BILL to pass............ Many coun tries like AUSTRALIA, CANADA gives more preferrance to graduates from their Universities.
more...
pictures colouring page, click to
Canadian_Dream
12-19 04:51 PM
You can file as many I-140's in any category (EB2/EB3/NIW) as long as you have a certified labor for a bona fide position with a matching education and company has ability to pay for those positions. These I-140's can come from one company or different ones it doesn't matter.
In your current situation:
1. Don't even think about doing anything with pending I-140 and AOS. There is a definite delay in I-140 approvals at both NSC/TSC so waiting is the best thing to do. As long as your qualification matches the LC description you will get your I-140 approved. If your I-140 is pending 30 days past the processing time and you haven't received an RFE, it might have been stuck in security check. Your lawyer needs to open a service request to find out what is going on.
2. For the labor that is expiring in Jan, go ahead and file an I-140 petition right now, there is nothing to worry about two I-140. If nothing else this petition can be used for 3 year H1B extension in case the first one gets stuck.
3. The second I-140 that you are filing can't be used for your pending AOS if your priority date is not current. Check the Pearson Interfiling memo ( from link below). If your priority dates are current and will remain current (EB2 ROW) file for an new AOS application when your second I-140 gets approved. If by this time your first I-140 is approved you can simply toss the second I-140 in the office shredder.
http://www.ilw.com/seminars/august2002_citation2c.pdf
Thanks for your responses guys. Now I understand that once I withdraw my old I-140, my I-485 is gone.
Reg my question 2, I know that people file 1 in EB3 and second in EB2. Or after one is approved file another one with earlier PD LC. But, is it possible to apply for second I-140 in the same category (EB3) when another one is already pending? Have any one done this before?. Could you guys point me to some links?
I asked this question to my lawyer. No response yet. I would really appreciate your response.
In your current situation:
1. Don't even think about doing anything with pending I-140 and AOS. There is a definite delay in I-140 approvals at both NSC/TSC so waiting is the best thing to do. As long as your qualification matches the LC description you will get your I-140 approved. If your I-140 is pending 30 days past the processing time and you haven't received an RFE, it might have been stuck in security check. Your lawyer needs to open a service request to find out what is going on.
2. For the labor that is expiring in Jan, go ahead and file an I-140 petition right now, there is nothing to worry about two I-140. If nothing else this petition can be used for 3 year H1B extension in case the first one gets stuck.
3. The second I-140 that you are filing can't be used for your pending AOS if your priority date is not current. Check the Pearson Interfiling memo ( from link below). If your priority dates are current and will remain current (EB2 ROW) file for an new AOS application when your second I-140 gets approved. If by this time your first I-140 is approved you can simply toss the second I-140 in the office shredder.
http://www.ilw.com/seminars/august2002_citation2c.pdf
Thanks for your responses guys. Now I understand that once I withdraw my old I-140, my I-485 is gone.
Reg my question 2, I know that people file 1 in EB3 and second in EB2. Or after one is approved file another one with earlier PD LC. But, is it possible to apply for second I-140 in the same category (EB3) when another one is already pending? Have any one done this before?. Could you guys point me to some links?
I asked this question to my lawyer. No response yet. I would really appreciate your response.
dresses Free Disney coloring pages
bsbawa10
07-18 09:39 AM
Are the processing times according to the notice date or the received date ? Mine are 4 months apart.
more...
makeup disney fairy coloring page
tv25
09-16 02:46 PM
Thanks for your replies.
No, They did not cancel H4 when I went for H1 stamping.
I want to see if there is any way that the H1 can be withdrawn pending determination from USCIS?
No, They did not cancel H4 when I went for H1 stamping.
I want to see if there is any way that the H1 can be withdrawn pending determination from USCIS?
girlfriend SPRING COLOURING BOOK PAGES
eb3retro
11-19 12:59 PM
i would say its a long wait..its high time u get it..congrats..
sorry, i take it back..did not notice that ur case is a sub..i understand that its legal, but its just a hole in the system. no offense to you, but i am blaming the system.
sorry, i take it back..did not notice that ur case is a sub..i understand that its legal, but its just a hole in the system. no offense to you, but i am blaming the system.
hairstyles sea shell coloring page;
snathan
11-15 04:18 PM
No...if its going to take the quota from 104K and if there is going to be any loophole.
gsc999
03-27 04:43 PM
gsc u r a lil confused
speaker pelosi is the head of the house of representatives (Lok Sabha) with Steny Hoyer serving as majority leader in the House and Senator Reid is the majority leader of the Senate (Rajya Sabha). The president of the senate is the VP
Both have floor schedules and have issues that need to be debated on. the bill has to pass in both houses..either with the exact same wording or alternate text that will be reconciled in conference committee
http://www.answers.com/topic/party-leaders-of-the-united-states-senate
http://www.answers.com/topic/party-leaders-of-the-united-states-house-of-representatives
---
Yaba:
The title of this thread is discussion on Senate floor in May 14-21, no confusion about that. Reid will schedule the debate not Pelosi. I don't know if you have even read the article quoted here? It clearly mentions Hoyer in House and Reid in Senate. If nat23 had said why is Hoyer driving the agenda in house and not Pelosi? That would make perfect sense but how can Pelosi drive Senate agenda. My response was to that point. If you still argue that, I think you might need to clarify things at your end.
Also, the example you cite isn't appropriate to the context because both Indian Lok Sabha and the British House of Commons have a non-partisan Speaker. He resigns from his primary party as soon as he becomes the speaker. This is not the case in US congress, speaker of the US house of congress is a partisan leader. The implication is that Hoyer, even though a majority House leader may not drive the agenda and this connects to the point made earlier: Pelosi vs Hoyer not Pelosi vs Reid.
speaker pelosi is the head of the house of representatives (Lok Sabha) with Steny Hoyer serving as majority leader in the House and Senator Reid is the majority leader of the Senate (Rajya Sabha). The president of the senate is the VP
Both have floor schedules and have issues that need to be debated on. the bill has to pass in both houses..either with the exact same wording or alternate text that will be reconciled in conference committee
http://www.answers.com/topic/party-leaders-of-the-united-states-senate
http://www.answers.com/topic/party-leaders-of-the-united-states-house-of-representatives
---
Yaba:
The title of this thread is discussion on Senate floor in May 14-21, no confusion about that. Reid will schedule the debate not Pelosi. I don't know if you have even read the article quoted here? It clearly mentions Hoyer in House and Reid in Senate. If nat23 had said why is Hoyer driving the agenda in house and not Pelosi? That would make perfect sense but how can Pelosi drive Senate agenda. My response was to that point. If you still argue that, I think you might need to clarify things at your end.
Also, the example you cite isn't appropriate to the context because both Indian Lok Sabha and the British House of Commons have a non-partisan Speaker. He resigns from his primary party as soon as he becomes the speaker. This is not the case in US congress, speaker of the US house of congress is a partisan leader. The implication is that Hoyer, even though a majority House leader may not drive the agenda and this connects to the point made earlier: Pelosi vs Hoyer not Pelosi vs Reid.
walking_dude
11-24 05:33 PM
Let bygones be bygones. No point in beating the dead horse. Nothing will be achieved by opening old wounds.
Let us be united from now on for all our sakes ( both Eb2 and Eb3)
Agreed but this should be from both the side.
Most of us talk about unity till it suits us ( and i dont mean walking_dude, i am aware of the great service has done, including the fight to ammend the drivers license issue).
Let us be united from now on for all our sakes ( both Eb2 and Eb3)
Agreed but this should be from both the side.
Most of us talk about unity till it suits us ( and i dont mean walking_dude, i am aware of the great service has done, including the fight to ammend the drivers license issue).
No comments:
Post a Comment